Prediction Markets Have Cost States $600 Million in Lost Tax Revenue Over Last 12 Months

Submitted by Aaron Goldstein on

Written by :

Aaron Goldstein

Published on :

Prediction Markets

Play'N Go Head of Government Affairs Shawn Fluharty claimed during Wednesday's NEXT Summit NYC that prediction markets, primarily Kalshi and Polymarket, have cost U.S. states $600 Million over the last 12 months

Polymarket has only recently re-entered the U.S. market after being granted clearance by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).  

More than a dozen states are challenging sports event contracts in court, with many observers expecting the Supreme Court to ultimately decide their legality.

The current administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is supportive of this sector.  Trump's son, Donald Jr., serves on the advisory board of Polymarket and as a strategic advisor with Kalshi. 

DraftKings and FanDuel recently launched their own sports event contract platforms in December 2025, much to the dismay of state regulators.  But the two companies lead in marketshare in most states where they are regulated. 

 

 

According to gaming industry lobbyist Bill Pascrell III, the earliest we can expect to see a Supreme Court case on prediction markets is late 2027.  Without a Supreme Court decision, prediction markets could run afoul of a future presidential administration.

Congress is also less likely to push for federal legislation of sports betting as this would cut off the spigot generated from the tax on gambling revenues. 

To date, these states have warned Kalshi to cease offering event contracts, in particular sports markets, to its residents. 

  • Arizona
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Montana
  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • Ohio
  • Tennessee
  • Connecticut
  • New York

Massachusetts, Nevada and Michigan have had some success in filing lawsuits against Kalshi. 

On Tuesday, Michigan's federal court preliminarily determined that sports-event contracts are not "swaps" subject to CFTC exclusive jurisdiction.

Entities like Kalshi continue to circumvent the gaming prohibitions imposed by (state law) and, in so doing, threaten the health, safety, and welfare of Michigan citizens," Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel claims. 

Massachusetts Attorney General sued to block sports event contracts and obtained a preliminary injunction restricting Kalshi from operating in the state.

Kalshi has filed suits of its own against New Jersey, Maryland and, more recently, Utah.  The latter state does not allow any form of gambling.  

  • Gilbert Horowitz, Gambling911.com 

Related Content

Richard Blumenthal

Connecticut Senator Demands Leagues Explain Sports Betting Partnerships

His letter comes just over a week after the Trump Administration sued Connecticut over its attempts to keep prediction markets from doing business in the state.
Kalshi

New Jersey Court Finds in Favor of Kalshi

A three-judge panel of the Third Circuit upheld a preliminary injunction for the Kalshi exchange against enforcement by the state of New Jersey over sports-related event contracts, becoming the first federal ruling on prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket
Prediction markets

Prediction Markets Challenge Tribal Casinos’ Hard-Won Place in US Gambling

At the Indian Gaming Association’s annual convention in San Diego this week, two words have dominated the agenda: Prediction markets.
Kalshi

Nevada Judge Extends Kalshi Ban

A Nevada judge on Friday moved to extend a ban on the prediction market Kalshi, citing regulators claims the company is operating without a proper gaming license to conduct business in the state.